An “Oops!” moment, indeed.
OK, Herman. You’ve had plenty of time to study the issues. If someone asks you your opinion on events in Lybia, you should be able to respond in less than 10 seconds.
Not only should you have a position on whether it was right to support the rebellion, you should be able to hit this one out of the park. It was supposed to take “days, not weeks.” The rebels were an unknown quantity; all we knew was that they had links to Al Qaeda. We conducted the war the same way every Democrat does, for political reasons, putting our soldiers into harm’s way without a clear mission. Now terrorists are running wild, surely shipping out Qadafi’s arsenal to the front lines to use against our troops.
How is this NOT a slam dunk question for any presidential candidate???
Instead this happens:
Asked if he agreed with the president, Cain said, “Okay, Libya,” and then was silent for about ten — yes, ten — seconds, before asking, “President Obama supported the uprising, correct?”
Cain then said he did not agree with Obama’s handling of the uprising, before adding: “No, that’s a different one. I’ve got to go back, got all this stuff twirling around in my head. Specifically, what are you asking me did I agree or not agree with Obama.”
Finally, Cain concluded that he “would have done a better job of assessing the situation relative to the opposition first, before I made decisions about what we would do” but did not spell out any differentiation on policy.
Perry’s blunder was far more forgivable. Forgetting the name of a cabinet department 75% of Americans probably don’t even know exists is a lot different from having no understanding of what is going on in a region with such serious implications for our national security.
Herman Cain needs to deliver a serious, substantial speech on foreign policy. He needs to flesh out real positions on Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Lybia, Syria, North Korea, China, Russia, and the European financial crisis. He must do this soon. Or he will have no chance at the nomination.
9-9-9 isn’t enough. We don’t need a President who is nothing more than a good speaker with a catchy slogan. We already tried that in 2008.
Further Discussion: Hot Air, Right Wing News.